SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts keyed to Robertson
Mischalkski v. Ford Motor Company
Citation:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 1996. 935 F.Supp. 203.Facts
The Plaintiff, Mischalski, was a Polish citizen who arrived in the U.S. in 1960 and remained after his visa expired. The Plaintiff worked as an automobile mechanic. During his off hours at the auto shop he worked at, the Plaintiff started to replace the air suspension of a 1990 Lincoln Town Car owned by one of his friends. In order to life the car, the Plaintiff used a tire jack provided by the manufacturer of the car, the Defendant, Ford Motor Company. While working, the jack collapsed due to the stripping of the internal threads in the trunnion area. As a result, the Plaintiff was injured and sued the Defendant alleging product liability and failure to warn as theories.
Ford filed a motion to amend its answer to add an additional affirmative defense and for an order in limine to introduce evidence at trial of the Plaintiff’s alien status and related illegal conduct. The proposed affirmative defense stated that at the time of the occurrence alleged in the complaint, the Plaintiff was an illegal alien and was there engaged in an illegal transaction or unlicensed employment and that this should bar the Plaintiff from seeking damages.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Videos
Topic Refresher Courses
Negligence Forseeable-Proximate Cause Negligence: Joint Tortfeasors, Identification and Contribution