SmartBrief
0
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Farnsworth
Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz
Citation:
172 F.2d 80Facts
Campbell Soup Company (“Campbell”) (plaintiff) entered into a written contract with George Wentz and Harry Wentz (collectively “the Wentzes”) (defendants) for the sale of Chantenay red cored carrots. Their contract specified the price range of the carrots to be between $23 to $30 per ton. By the time the Wentzes harvested the carrots, the market price was at least $90 per ton and Chantenay red cored carrots were nearly unobtainable. The Wentzes informed Campbell that they would not deliver their carrots to them at the contract price. The Wentzes then sold the majority of their carrots to a neighboring farmer. Campbell brought suit against the Wentzes, seeking specific performance of the contract.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
12m 10sTopic Outline 
Topic Refresher Course 