This question should be answered in REAC format (Rule, Explanation, Application, Conclusion).
While on routine patrol, police officers observed Malvolio make an illegal U-turn across Padua Street. After stopping Malvolio’s car, they observed him reach under the driver’s seat. They ordered him out of the car and saw a cellophane package protruding from under the seat. The package contained a white powdery substance, which the officers suspected to be cocaine.
The officers place Malvolio under arrest and put him in the rear of their patrol car. They then proceeded to search the rest of Malvolio’s car. In the trunk they found an Uzi, which was later determined to be the weapon used in a liquor store robbery. Charged with that robbery, Malvolio moved to suppress the Uzi as evidence on the ground that the police did not have a warrant to search the trunk.
The evidence will be:
NotepadClick anywhere in notepad to add a note
Topic Label Each Sentence
To provide the most accurate and beneficial review, critique, and feedback to your writing, please topic label each sentence of your answer, as seen below, prior to submitting.
Hint
First, consider the basis the officers had for stopping Malvolio. Was there a legal basis for the stop? By noticing and seizing the white powdery substance under the seat, were the police granted a warrant exception to search the rest of the vehicle?
Topics
Grammar
Readability
Tone
Grade
Critique and FeedbackHang tight! Your Reviewer is critiquing and scoring your submission which could take 30-90 seconds.
Saving Progress ...
All work will be saved, however the time spent will start from zero when you continue.
