This question should be answered using two IRAC structures. Please include all relevant keywords in your answer.
Charlie sues Main Street Cars for selling and refusing to repair a car that broke down after 5 miles. At trial, Charlie testifies that a salesman at Main Street Cars said while selling him the car, “We will repair the car for free if it breaks down before 1,000 miles.” This is offered to prove that Charlie was entitled to a free repair from Main Street Cars. Charlie also testifies that a former manager of Main Street Cars said at a bar, “My nephew took over and has been selling used cars as brand new.” Are these two statements admissible as a party-opponent admission?
NotepadClick anywhere in notepad to add a note
Topic Label Each Sentence
To provide the most accurate and beneficial review, critique, and feedback to your writing, please topic label each sentence of your answer, as seen below, prior to submitting.
Hint
To answer this question, you should think about whether and when the authorized admission of a party-opponent is admissible as an exception to hearsay.
drag_indicator
drag_indicator
+
Select Issue/Subject to discuss
Salesman's Statement
Former Manager's Statement
Topics
Grammar
Readability
Tone
Grade
Critique and FeedbackHang tight! Your Reviewer is critiquing and scoring your submission which could take 30-90 seconds.
Saving Progress ...
All work will be saved, however the time spent will start from zero when you continue.
