Confirm favorite deletion?
Evidence Keyed to Best
United States v. Schnapp
Citation:322 F.3d 564 (2003).
The store operated by Schnapp burned down. Schumacher conducted an initial investigation and told Schnapp the fire had probably started in the store’s furnace room ceiling. A subsequent investigation, conducted by the store’s insurance carrier, found the fire had probably been started by a human on the furnace room floor. Schumacher and the insurance carrier (Buxton & Pyr-Tech, Inc.) both wrote reports which attributed the fire to human origins.
During trial, Schnapp testified as to Schumacher’s initial statements that the fire had started in the room’s ceiling, after Schumacher had been cross-examined. During cross-examination, Schnapp’s counsel never asked Schumacher about the prior inconsistent statement.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
Topic Refresher CourseImpeachment of the Witness