SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law Keyed to Lee
State v. Crenshaw
Citation:
98 Wash.2d 789, 659 P.2d 488 (1983)Facts
Crenshaw and his wife were on their honeymoon in Canada. Crenshaw ended up getting deported as a result of his participation in a fight. He got a hotel in Blaine, Washington, and waited for his wife to join him. She arrived two days later and Crenshaw immediately thought that she had been unfaithful.
He did not ask her about it, instead he took her to the hotel room and beat her until she was unconscious. He then stole a knife from a store and returned to her, stabbing her 24 times. She did not survive the attack. Afterwards, Crenshaw drove to a nearby farm where he had been employed, borrowed an ax, and returned to the hotel room and decapitated her.
He proceeded to conceal his actions. He placed the body in a blanket, the head in a pillow case, and put both in his wife’s car. He cleaned the room of blood and fingerprints. He hid the body in a thick bush in a remote area. Crenshaw then drove 200 miles away from the scene of the crime and picked up two hitchhikers. He told them what he had done, and enlisted their aid in disposing of the wife’s car. The hitchhikers called the police. Crenshaw voluntarily confessed to the crime.
At trial, Crenshaw asserted an insanity defense. He testified that he followed the Moscovite religious faith, and that it would be improper for a Moscovite not to kill his wife if she had committed adultery. He also has a history of mental problems for which he has been hospitalized in the past for. The trial court gave a jury instruction that included: “for a defendant to be found not guilty by reason of insanity you must find that . . . the defendant . . . was unable to tell right from wrong.” Further, the trial court defined right and wrong as “knowledge of a person at the time of committing an act that he was acting contrary to the law.” The jury rejected the defense and he was found guilty of first degree murder.
Crenshaw appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in defining right and wrong as a legal right and wrong rather than in the moral sense.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.