Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law Keyed to Abrams
Salinas v. United States
Citation:522 U.S. 52, 118 S.Ct. 469, 139 L.Ed.2d 352 (1997)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Salinas (Defendant) was a deputy sheriff in Hidalgo County, Texas. The United States Marshals Service and Hidalgo County entered into agreements under which the county would take custody of federal prisoners in exchange for a federal government grant for improving its jail. While the county was receiving this federal money, Salinas was involved in a scheme where he exchanged contact visits for a prisoner with his wife and girlfriend, in exchange for a pair of designer watches and a pickup truck. The United States (Prosecution) charged Salinas with one count of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), one count of conspiracy, and two counts of bribery. The jury acquitted Salinas on the substantive RICO count but convicted him on the other counts.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.