SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Civil Procedure Keyed to Subrin
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.
Citation:
322 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 2017)Facts
Plaintiffs sued, alleging that Defendants violated antitrust laws. Plaintiffs claimed Defendants conspired to fix fuel rates and surcharges at anticompetitive levels and maintain a monopoly. Plaintiffs claimed it paid $50 million in illegal fuel charges as a result and sought treble damages plus lost profits. During discovery, Plaintiffs produced documents from 19 records custodians. However, Defendants sought the records of William Koch, Plaintiffs’ founder, CEO, and principal. Defendants claimed Koch had unique information that would show market forces—not the alleged railroad conspiracy—caused increasing rail freight costs and Plaintiffs’ losses. Plaintiffs resisted the discovery as unduly burdensome, expensive, and duplicative of the documents already produced by its 19 records custodians. However, Plaintiffs willingly conducted a sample search to determine the relevant percentage. A vendor searched almost half a million documents from Koch’s physical and electronic files, at a cost of $57,000. About 12 percent returned as responsive, and Plaintiffs produced about 1,300 records from that sampling. But Plaintiffs estimated that searching, reviewing, and producing the remainder would cost another $85,000 and objected to production as unduly burdensome and costly. Alternatively, Plaintiffs asked the court to shift the production costs to Defendants .
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.