SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts Keyed to Henderson
Leichtman v. WLW Jacor Communications
Citation:
634 N.E.2d 697 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994)ProfessorMelissa A. Hale
CaseCast™ – "What you need to know"
Facts
Ahron Leichtman was a nationally known antismoking advocate. WLW Bill Cunningham radio talk show invited him to talk about the harmful effects of smoking on a radio talk show hosted by William Cunningham. While Leichtman was at the studio, Andy Furman, another host on the talk show lit a cigar, and repeatedly blew smoke in Leichtman’s face. Leichtman claimed that the host William Cunningham urged Furman to do that. Leichtman contended that Furman’s act constituted a battery. He contended that Cunningham should be liable too because her urged the smoker. The radio company also should be liable for its employee’s intentional act.
The trial court dismissed Leichtman’s complaint. Leichtman appealed to the Ohio Court of Appeals.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Outline
Intentional Torts