Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts Keyed to Goldberg
Jones v. Dressel
Facts
Michael Jones, Plaintiff,a 17 year old, entered into a contractual agreement with Free Flight Sport Aviation, Inc., Defendant, for recreational skydiving services, such as transportation by airplane to the jump site. The contract contained an exculpatory clause that would releaseDefendant, its owners, agents, and employees from any liability for losses or injury sustained by Defendant while using Defendant’s services, including its aircraft, regardless if the harm was caused by Defendant’s negligence. The contract had an alternative provision that would waive the exculpatory clause in exchange for a $50 fee. However, that provision was crossed out when Plaintiff received the agreement to sign. Plaintiff did not inquire into the crossed out provision, resulting in ambiguity of whether Defendant would apply the alternative provision to Plaintiff. Once Plaintiff turned 18, Plaintiff sustained serious injuries in a crash of a Plaintiff’s airplane while on the route to a jump site. A year later, Plaintiff sued Defendant, the plane’s owners and operators, and the Littleton Airport on the grounds of negligence and willful and wanton conduct. The trial court granted defendants’ partial motion for summary judgment on the negligence issue. The appellate court affirmed. Plaintiff appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.