Confirm favorite deletion?
Evidence Keyed to Sklansky
Gary v. Maryland
Citation:523 U.S. 185 (1998)
A woman named Stacy Williams dies after a severe beating. A man named Anthony Bell confessed to police that he, the defendant, and another man beat Ms. Williams to death. Bell and the defendant were tried jointly. The trial court allowed Bell’s confession into evidence at trial but ordered the confession redacted. However, the redaction simply replaced the defendant’s name with a kind of symbol, namely the word “deleted”. Therefore, the defendant’s name was removed from the confession. Bell did not testify. The trial judge instructed the jury that the confession was evidence only against Bell. The jury convicted both Bell and the defendant. Gray appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.