SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Levinson
Frontiero v. Richardson
Citation:
411 U.S. 677 (1973)Facts
A federal law stated that a serviceman could claim his wife as a “dependent” in order to obtain allowances and medical and dental benefits, regardless of whether his wife was actually dependent on his salary for support. However, a servicewoman could not receive an allowance for her husband, unless he was dependent on her for over one-half of his support. Frontiero (Petitioner), a female lieutenant in the U.S. air force, sought allowances for her husband but was denied because she was not able to demonstrate that her husband was dependent on her for more than one-half of his support, as required by federal law. She filed suit against Richardson (Respondent), the U.S. Secretary of Defense, arguing that the law was unconstitutional because it discriminated on the basis of sex.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Outline
Fifth Amendment Rights