Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Farber
Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Facts
In 2002, Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Among other provisions, it provided for regulating of the accounting industry by a new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (Board) (defendant). The Board was to be composed of five members, appointed to staggered five-year terms. The Board is under the oversight of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), but the SEC cannot remove Board members except for good cause. SEC Commissioners determine whether there is good cause to remove a Board member. SEC Commissioners cannot be removed by the President except for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” The Board began an investigation of Beckstead and Watts, LLP, a Nevada accounting firm, after it found deficiencies in its accounting procedures in an inspection. Beckstead and Watts and the Free Enterprise Fund, a non-profit organization of which Beckstead& Watts is a member, (plaintiffs) brought suit, seeking, inter alia, a declaratory judgment that the Board is unconstitutional because the Board’s protection from removal is in conflict with Article II’s vesting of the executive power in the President. The lower courts rejected plaintiffs’ claims. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.