Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Farber
Ex Parte McCardle
Citation:74 U.S. (7 Wall). 506 (1869)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
McCardle was a civilian being held for trial by military commission in Mississippi for allegedly publishing “incendiary and libelous” articles in his newspaper in violation of federal Reconstruction statutes. The federal circuit court denied his application for habeas corpus, and he appealed to the Supreme Court. MrCardle relied on 1876 federal statute providing the Supreme Court with appellate jurisdiction in habeas corpus cases. The case was argued in the Supreme Court in early March 1868. On March 27, 1868, Congress enacted a statute that provided “that so much of the act of 1867 as authorized an appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court to the Supreme Court, or the exercise of any such jurisdiction by said Supreme Court, on appeals which have been, or may hereafter be taken, and the same is hereby repealed.”
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.