Confirm favorite deletion?
Property Law Keyed to Kurtz
Connecticut Bank and Trust Company v. Brody
Citation:174 Conn. 616, 392 A.2d 445
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
The petitioner and respondent, while contemplating marriage, bought a purchaser’s interest in a contract for the sale of a single-family residence and assumed the contract’s obligations. Both parties contributed to the down payment. The petitioner and respondent received the interest as tenants in common. The parties later married. The respondent would then depart the residence. The petitioner remained on the property. The respondent later argued that she was entitled to one-half of the equity that had been built up in the property and demanded one-half of the rental value of the premises for the time period that the petitioner occupied the premises alone. At trial, the respondent testified that she left the premises to protect her children, who were in danger of the sexual activities of the petitioner’s son. The respondent testified that she stated that one of the would have to leave and he had said it would have to be her.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
- Policy: Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.
- Court Direction: Shares where the Court went from here for this case.