Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Dawson
Cohen v. Kranz
Facts
On September 22, 1959, the Plaintiff, Cohen (the "Plaintiff"), contracted to purchase the Defendants', Kranz and others (the "Defendants"), home. The Plaintiff agreed to pay $40,000. Upon signing the contract, the Plaintiff paid $4000. The rest of the money was due at the closing, which was scheduled for November 15, 1959. The closing was delayed by the Plaintiff until December 15, 1959. In the meantime, on November 30, 1959, the Plaintiff's attorney sent the Defendant's attorney a letter demanding a refund of the $4,000 because title was found to be unmarketable. The Defendant's attorney refused to return the money, and this proceeding was commenced by the Plaintiff for return of the $4,000 plus monies for the title search. The Plaintiff was victorious before the trial court because the Defendant never obtained a certificate of occupancy for a swimming pool and a fence on the property stretched over the property line. The trial court found that both of these things affected the marketability of the Plaintiff's title. The Appellate Division reversed and found the contents of the Plaintiff's November 30, 1959 letter insufficient because it did not claim specific instances of illegality.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.