Confirm favorite deletion?
Wills, Trusts & Estates keyed to Dobris
Cohen v. Commissioner
Facts
In several consolidated cases the grantors of irrevocable trusts, of which the grantors or their spouse were beneficiary and to which the grantor had transferred substantial assets, claimed eligibility for Medicaid assistance because the trust denies the trustee any discretion to make sums available to the grantor if such available would render the grantor ineligible for public assistance. The grantors of these trusts argue that since no funds are available by the terms of the trusts if such would render them ineligible that the grantors’ eligibility is assured. The state argues that this frustrates the stated purpose of Congress in enacting the MQT statute. The MQT statute provides that if there are circumstances under which payment from the trust could be made to or for the benefit of the individual then such payment shall be considered as a resource available to the individual. The trial court held against the beneficiaries of the trusts that under the statute if there was even a small amount of discretion regarding the availability of funds then whatever the beneficiary could most receive in the full exercise of that discretion was the amount to be counted as available for Medicaid eligibility. The beneficiaries now appeal.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.