Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts Keyed to Goldberg
Chow v. Reckitt & Colman, Inc.
Facts
Yun Tung Chow (plaintiff) worked at a restaurant in New York City. Whenever a drain in the restaurant kitchen became clogged, Chow used a product called Red Devil Lye (RDL), which consisted of 100 percent lye, to unclog it. RDL was made and packaged by Reckitt & Colman, Inc. (R&C) (defendant). Chow did not read English and never read the directions for RDL. On the date of Chow’s injury, the drain became clogged. Chow placed about three spoonfuls of RDL into a dry aluminum container, added three cups of cold water, and then poured the mixture into the drain. The solution splashed back into Chow’s face, causing serious burns and ultimately the loss of vision in one eye. Chow and his wife (plaintiff) sued R&C in a New York state court, alleging inadequate failure to warn and defective design. R&C moved for summary judgment, relying upon Chow’s mishandling of the product and an attorney’s affirmation that (1) RDL was widely known to be dangerous and (2) any change to its formulation would result in a different product. The trial court granted summary judgment to R&C, and the Appellate Division affirmed. The Chows appealed the judgment with respect to the design-defect claim.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.