Confirm favorite deletion?
Civil Procedure Keyed to Glannon
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
Citation:439 U.S. 322 (1979)
CaseCast™ – "What you need to know"
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
In a prior federal court proceeding, the SEC filed a complaint against Petitioners seeking injunctive relief. The SEC asserted, and the district court found, that Parklane’s proxy statement was materially false and misleading. The federal district court in the SEC’s action entered a declaratory judgment that the proxy statement was materially false and misleading. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Subsequently, Respondent’s filed a stockholder’s class action complaint against the Petitioners, who were the same parties against whom the SEC’s action was filed, alleging violations of various federal securities laws and regulations. In the subsequent action, Respondent moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of the materially false and misleading proxy statement. The district court denied the motion for partial summary judgment. The Court of Appeals reversed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.