Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts Keyed to Goldberg
Burns Philp Food, Inc. v. CavaleaCont’l Freight, Inc.
Facts
Burns Philp Food, Inc. (Burns) (plaintiff) and CavaleaCont’l Freight, Inc. (Cavalea) (defendant) purchased adjacent portions of land in Chicago. Because of an error in the property records, Burns mistakenly paid property taxes on land owned by Cavalea over a number of years. When Burns informed Cavalea of the mistake, Cavalea refused to reimburse Burns. Burns then sued Cavalea in a federal district court for restitution. Cavalea filed a counterclaim, alleging that Burns had erected a fence that trespassed on Cavalea’s property. Receipt of the counterclaim was the first time Burns received notice of the alleged trespass.Cavalea had been aware of the trespass for some period of time before filing the counterclaim. After a nonjury trial, the court ruled that Burns was entitled to recover five years of taxes paid on Cavalea’s land and that Cavalea was not entitled to damages for Burns’s trespass because Cavalea had failed to provide notice thereof. The district judge acknowledged that requiring notice was not necessarily consistent with the traditional law of trespass but that it was proper in the instant case as a matter of “elemental justice.” Both parties appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.