Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts Keyed to Goldberg
Beul v. ASSE Int’l, Inc.
Facts
Kristin Beul (plaintiff), a 16-year-old German exchange student, was placed by ASSE Int’l, Inc. (ASSE) (defendant) with a Wisconsin host family. Marianne Breber, a volunteer representative of ASSE, placed Beul with the Bruce family: Richard, his wife, and their 13-year-old daughter. Beul arrived in Wisconsin on September 7, 1995. ASSE was subject to federal regulations designed to protect the welfare of foreign exchange students. The regulations required ASSE to regularly monitor the safety and progress of placements and to schedule recurring contact with the student and the host family. An industry association to which ASSE belonged also required its members to maintain abundant, regular contact with students’ host families and schools. For the first four and a half months of Beul’s visit, Breber met with her just once, for a brief orientation with another student. Breber spoke with Beul by phone once or twice but always while Beul was in the presence of a host family member. In November 1995, Richard raped Beul. The two then began a sexual relationship. That winter, Beul missed 27 days of school. Richard told Beul he would kill himself if she told anyone what was going on. In January 1996, after Beul and Richard told Breber that Mrs. Bruce appeared to be jealous of Richard’s time with Beul, Breber went to the Bruce home for dinner. Breber did not seek to speak privately with Beul or Mrs. Bruce. In February, Mrs. Bruce told Breber that she and Richard were divorcing and that Beul should be placed with another family. Beul refused to leave; on February 22, a sheriff’s deputy came to remove her. Breber called Beul’s school to let them know she would be out for a few days, at which point Breber learned of Beul’s many absences. Beul lived with Breber for a few days, but Breber never asked about her relationship with Richard. Beul and Richard continued to correspond. In April, Mrs. Bruce found some of the correspondence and contacted police. Having sex with a 16-year-old was a misdemeanor. After being interviewed by police, Richard committed suicide. Beul sued ASSE in a federal district court. A jury found Beul to be 41 percent at fault for her injury. ASSE was determined to be 59 percent at fault. Accordingly, of the total damages of $1,100,000, Beul was awarded 59 percent, or $649,000. ASSE appealed, citing insufficient proof of causation.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.