Torts Keyed to Henderson
Stahlecker v. Ford Motor Company
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
During the early morning of April 29, 2000, Amy Stahlecker was driving a 1997 Ford Explorer equipped with Firestone Wilderness AT radial tires in a remote area when one of the tires failed, leaving Amy stranded. Richard Cook (Defendant) encountered Amy alone and assaulted and murdered her. Susan and Dale Stahlecker (Plaintiffs), parents and special administrators of Amy’s estate filed a wrongful death suit against Cook, Ford Motor Company (Defendant), and Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. (Defendant) alleging that Amy’s murder was a direct result of the tire failure. Plaintiffs alleged that Ford and Bridgestone/Firestone withheld knowledge of the defective nature of the Ford Explorer’s tires and that they had a tendency to blow out. Plaintiffs also alleged that Ford and Bridgestone/Firestone had, or should have had, knowledge regarding the likelihood of criminal acts committed against those individuals stranded due to auto failures in general. The district court sustained demurrers on behalf of Ford and Bridgestone/Firestone and dismissed the actions as to them and Plaintiffs appealed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.