Torts Keyed to Dobbs
Hale v. Ostrow
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Plaintiff Hale was walking home on a sidewalk that she had not traveled before. As she proceeded, she noticed that bushes protruding from Defendants’ property at Mississippi Boulevard had overgrown the sidewalk and had grown around a telephone pole located on the sidewalk, blocking her way. She determined she had to leave the sidewalk and enter the street to bypass it. As she stepped off the sidewalk before she reached the bushes, she tripped over a chunk of concrete and fell into the street. Her left hip was crushed in the fall requiring extensive medical care. The crumbled sidewalk was located in front of 1063 Mississippi, property owned by another party. Plaintiff filed suit against Defendants and the other property owner. Defendants, the Ostrows, moved for summary judgment arguing that the injury was caused by the defective sidewalk, not the overgrown bushes. Trial court granted the Defendants’ motion, the Court of Appeals affirmed, and the Tennessee Supreme Court reversed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.