Confirm favorite deletion?
Property Keyed to Saxer
Benham v. Morton & Furbish Agency
Facts
In July 1999, Kathleen Benham (Plaintiff) and her family rented a cottage in Maine. The cottage was owned by Aline and Rheal Caron (Defendants), but the rental agreement was brokered by Morton & Furbish Agency (Defendant). The Carons hired Morton & Furbish to sell the cottage, but allowed Morton & Furbish to rent it in the meantime, as long as renters were restricted from entering the cottage’s attic. Plaintiff’s sister, Colleen Blevins, arranged to rent the cottage for two weeks without seeing it beforehand. Originally, Blevins contracted to rent a different cottage, but because the cottage was unavailable, Morton & Furbish unilaterally decided to provide the Carons’ cottage. Morton & Furbish supplied the linens, arranged for trash removal, and collected sales tax on the family’s use of the cottage. The family believed that they would use the cottage exclusively, with no one entering the cottage to clean or doing structural work on the cottage. Once the family arrived, they found the trapdoor to the attic was open. Plaintiff began climbing the stairs and then turned around and began to descend. On her way down, she fell and sustained injuries. The ladder had been built by Rheal Caron and had no guard or handrails. Plaintiff sued Defendants for negligent design of the stairs and the existence of a dangerous condition on the premises. The Superior Court granted motion for summary judgment in favor of Defendants, ruling that a landlord and tenant relationship existed between the parties and that landlords are not liable for injuries caused by defective conditions in areas that are exclusively in the possession of a lessee.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.