Property Keyed to Merrill
Intel Corporation v. Hamidi
ProfessorMelissa A. Hale
CaseCast™ – "What you need to know"
Facts
Intel Corporation, Plaintiff, provides an electronic mail (email) system for its employees. Plaintiff permits its employees to have “reasonable non-business use” of the emails. In six separate incidents over two years, Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi, Defendant, Plaintiff’s former employee, sent mass emails to about 35,000 of Plaintiff’s current employees at a time. Defendant’s communications to the Plaintiff’s employees were vital to Plaintiff’s employment practices. Defendant would provide Plaintiff’s employees with the chance of opting out of receiving his emails if they wanted to. Plaintiff’s employees, who received the emails, would discuss the emails’ content among other employees and managers. Besides such actions, Defendants emails did not cause any other disruption to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s computers. Multiple times, Plaintiff asked Defendant to stop using its equipment to send messages. Plaintiff brought suit against Defendant and asserted a trespass to chattels claim. Plaintiff motioned for summary judgement, and the trial court granted the motion and issued an injunction preventing Defendant from sending emails to Plaintiff’s employees through Plaintiff’s email system. The appellate court affirmed, and Defendant appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.