Confirm favorite deletion?
Intellectual Property Keyed to Merges
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Haute Diggity Dog, LLC
Facts
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. (LVM) (Plaintiff) is a well-known manufacturer and seller of various luxury goods, including ladies handbags, that has adopted trademarks and trade dress that are well recognized and have become famous and distinct. LVM (Plaintiff) has registered trademarks for “LOUIS VUITTON,” (the LOUIS VUITTON mark”); for a stylized monogram of “LV” (the “LV mark”); for a monogram canvas design consisting of a canvas with repetitions of the LV mark along with four-pointed stars, four-pointed stars inset in curved diamonds, and four-pointed flowers inset in circles (the “Monogram Canvas mark”). It also adopted a brightly colored version of the Monogram Canvas mark in which the LV mark and the designs were of various colors and the background was white (the “Multicolor design”). It also adopted another design consisting of a canvas with repetitions of the LV mark on a brown background (the “Cherry design”). Plaintiff’s products are very expensive, usually costing hundreds or thousands of dollars. Although Plaintiff also markets a limited selection of luxury pet accessories, it does not make dog toys. Haute Diggity Dog, LLC (Defendant) manufactures and sells a line of pet chew toys and beds whose names parody elegant high-end brands of products. In particular, Defendant created a line of “Chewy Vuiton” chew toys that resembled Plaintiff’s handbags. The toys loosely resemble miniature handbags and inarguably evoke Plaintiff handbags of similar shape, design, and color. In lieu of the LOUIS VUITTON mark, the dog toy uses “Chewy Vuiton”; in lieu of the LV mark, it uses “CV”; and the other symbols and colors used are imitations, but not exact ones, of those used in the Plaintiff Multicolor and Cherry designs. The chew toys were mainly sold in pet stores for approximately $20. Plaintiff claimed Defendant violated the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (TDRA) (there were other copyright and trademark claims) and sued Defendant for, inter alia, trademark dilution, claiming that Defendant advertising, sale and distribution of the “Chewy Vuiton” dog toys diluted its LOUIS VUITTON, LV, and Monogram Canvas marks, which are famous and distinctive. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court concluded that Defendant “Chewy Vuiton” dog toys were successful parodies of Plaintiff’s trademarks, designs, and products, and on that basis, entered judgment in favor of Haute Diggity Dog (Defendant) and all of LVM’s (Plaintiff) claims. The court of appeals granted review.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.