Criminal Law keyed to Dripps
State v. Mantelli
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Joseph Mantelli (Defendant), a Las Vegas, New Mexico, police officer, and his partner Steve Marquez, pursued a truck driven by Abelino Montoya, an eighteen-year-old high school student, and Gabriel Rubio who was a passenger. At one point, the police car and Montoya’s truck collided in an intersection. Defendant ran to the driver’s side window and broke it with the butt of his handgun. At the same time, Montoya turned the truck and began driving away. As the truck headed down a street, Defendant fired several shots from his handgun, two struck Montoya killing him. Defendant was charged with voluntary manslaughter, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and shooting a motor vehicle resulting in injury. At trial, Defendant argued that he fired his weapon because he felt the truck was being used as a deadly weapon and he feared for his and Marquez’ lives. The prosecution claimed that Defendant shot his weapon to prevent Montoya from escaping. Defendant’s roommate, a fellow LVPD police officer, testified that Defendant told him that he had shot the truck because it was about to get away. Additionally, Defendant testified that he positioned the police car to try to “block in” the truck so that it could not escape. Defendant conceded that he knew that a departmental policy required an officer not to use his patrol car as a roadblock without ensuring the pursued vehicle had a way out of the roadblock. Defendant was convicted on all counts and he appealed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.