Criminal Law keyed to Dripps
State v. Crouser
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Minor, a fourteen-year-old special education student who was prone to lie, was required to bring home to her mother and her mother’s boyfriend, Delbert Crouser (Defendant), a daily progress report from school. One day, Minor forgot to pick up the report from her counselor for her teachers to sign and, instead, filled out the report herself, changed some of the grades and attendance record. Defendant learned that Minor had changed the report and went to her room to punish her. Defendant spanked Minor numerous times on her bare buttocks with his hand as well as with a plastic baseball bat. The following day, Minor had difficulty sitting down in class due to the bruises that had formed on her buttocks. The school health aide and counselor observed the bruising and also noticed bruising to Minor’s arm, thigh, and torso. When questioned by school officials, as well as the police, Defendant admitted to spanking Minor but claimed that he did not feel that he had gone beyond reasonable discipline. Defendant was indicted for abuse of a family and household member. At trial, many people testified to the seriousness of the bruising on Minor’s body. One individual said in her experience she had never seen such extensive bruising in a parental discipline case and considered Defendant’s actions excessive. Minor’s mother testified that she observed the entire discipline event and did not believe that Defendant acted excessively and would have intervened if she felt Minor was seriously harmed. Defendant was convicted and he appealed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.