Criminal Law keyed to Dripps
State v. McCartney
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
McCartney (Defendant) and James Johnson entered into a cattle sharing agreement in which cows, owned by Johnson, would be on land leased by Defendant. The calves born were branded with Johnson’s 3-Lazy T brand in the spring and sold that fall. The profits were then split between the men. The agreement ended after four years and the remaining calves were sold at that time. Months later, a cow carrying Johnson’s brand was found on property belonging to a company which bordered the land Defendant had leased. Believing it was a stray, the president of the company, John Stahl, contacted Defendant wanting to purchase the stray cow. Defendant agreed, made out a bill of sale, and signed Johnson’s name as “seller” and his own name as “witness.” Defendant also drew a Lazy T in the middle of a 3 as the brand of the cow to be sold, similar to Johnson’s brand. Thereafter, Stahl checked with the brand office and noticed that the cow’s brand did not match the one Defendant had drawn. After Stahl sold the cow for $241, the brand office contacted Johnson who said he did not sell the cow, and subsequently began an investigation. Defendant was charged with one count of felony theft and one count of felony forgery. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found Defendant guilty on both counts and sentenced him to five years imprisonment with four years suspended. Defendant appealed.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.