Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law keyed to Dripps
United States v. Dykes
Facts
The French-American International School (FAIS) in San Francisco, California, hired British citizen, Isabel Dykes (Defendant), to teach mathematics. The school gave Defendant the appropriate paperwork to complete so that should could obtain a J-1 visa. Shortly after beginning her employment, Defendant and FAIS had a falling out. The school decided to terminate Defendantโs employment and advised her that her J-1 visa would become โnull and voidโ as a result. Defendant and her boyfriend responded by writing a letter to FAIS. The heading of the letter noted that it would detail โ[t]he illegal methods systematically used by FAIS to damage those teachers hired from abroadโ (emphasis in original). Defendantโ letter referred to the โillegalโ manner in which FAIS tried to harm Defendant and the โillegal extremesโ to which FAIS was prepared to achieve it. Further, Defendant wrote that FAIS continuously abused U.S. laws to โillegally get rid of those teaches who refused to be intimidated and forced into submission.โ As a result, Defendant claimed that she would send the letter to British and French government, as well as other authorities, and to the media. Defendant closed the letter by stating, โThe only way I can see for you and FAIS to get off the hook is for you to provide Ms. Defendant with an apologyโ and to โimmediately pay Ms. Defendant her full salary of $40,000 plus $20,000 for the damages you have caused to her.โ Defendant was charged with blackmail in violation of 18 U.S.C. ยง 873. Defendant was convicted and she appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.