Contracts Keyed to Kuney
Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. Lorraine Corp.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Royal Business Machines, Inc. (Royal) (defendant) went into a commercial agreement with Lorraine Corp. (Lorraine) (plaintiff) that stretched out over a span of a year and a half. Royal sold Lorraine copying machines. Lorraine documented suit for breach of warranties and fraud. Lorraine claimed that Royal breached the following express warranties: (1) that the machines and the parts were of high quality, (2) that repair frequency would be low, (3) that replacement parts would be promptly accessible, (4) that cost of maintenance and supplies would stay low, (5) that the machines had been tried broadly and are prepared for the market, (6) that the machines would confirm considerable benefits, (7) that the machines were safe and couldn't cause flames, and (8) that necessary service calls would remain low. After a bench trial, the court granted compensatory and punitive damages to Lorraine. Royal appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.