Confirm favorite deletion?
Civil Procedure Keyed to Silberman
Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association
Facts
Clara Sather, an elderly lady, was in poor health so she approved Charles Cook, who had taken her in and was dealing with her, to make withdrawals from her bank account at the Security First National Bank of Los Angeles (LA Bank). Cook later opened an account at the First National Bank of San Dimas (SD Bank) for the sake of "Clara Sather by Charles O. Cook." Subsequently, within the sight of a teller, a cashier, Cook, and Sather's doctor, Sather signed a form approving the transfer of all the funds from the LA Bank record to the SD Bank account. Cook later withdrew the whole balance from the SD Bank account and opened another account for the himself and his wife. At the point when Sather died, cook progressed toward becoming executor of her estate without mentioning the funds transferred to the SD Bank. Helen Bernhard and different recipients of Sather's will (plaintiffs) recorded protests to the administration of the will in probate court. The probate court decided that Sather, during her lifetime, had made a gift to Cook in coins. Bernhard, subsequent to assuming control as administrator of the estate, brought suit against Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association (Bank of America) (defendant), the successor to the SD Bank. Bernhard tried to recoup the amount of the transfer. The trial court decided for Bank of America because Cook's ownership for funds was established definitively in the probate court and Bernhard's case was precluded as res judicata. Bernhard appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.