Civil Procedure Keyed to Hazard
Banks v. City of Emeryville
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
On Halloween 1982, Mercedes Banks was arrested in Emeryville, California for public intoxication. She was brought to the Emeryville Police Department where she was placed in a holding cell. Later that night, the police station caught fire and she burned to death inside. It was eventually determined that the fire originated in her mattress. Banks’ family (Plaintiff) sued the City of Emeryville (Defendant) and the chief of the Emeryville Police Department (Defendant), alleging under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that the jail cell was inadequately furnished with dangerous material. Plaintiff further contended that the police department inadequately supervised the jail, which lead to Banks’ death. Defendant argued that Banks’ death was a suicide. The defendants later filed a third party complaint against various parties who were responsible for manufacturing, distributing, and selling the mattress involved in Banks’ death. The defendants sought indemnification or contribution from these parties based on a theory that the mattress was a defective product. The third party defendant’s filed a motion to dismiss the third party complaint.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.