Civil Procedure Keyed to Cross
Ali v. Wang Laboratories, Inc.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Procedural Posture & History: Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises: Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Ali, Plaintiff, employed by Wang Laboratories, Inc., Defendant, for about fifteen years, asserts that he suffered an injury at work, which created spurs on his vertebrae and indented the thecal sac in his spine. Further, the injury resulted in the creation of many chronic physical problems, which permanently limited his range of motion and capabilities. Plaintiff contends that his injury is deemed a disability, pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, ADA. Plaintiff asserts that Defendant terminated him in violation of the ADA and other federal and state laws, due to his disability, age, and national origin. Plaintiff brought suit-seeking damages for severe emotional and mental distress caused by the termination. Plaintiff states he can still perform this essential job functions and wants to be re-employed. Defendant disagrees and wants Plaintiff to undergo physical and mental examinations. Thus, Defendant filed a motion to compel the examinations. Plaintiff objected, and the judge heard oral arguments on the issue.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
- Concurring / Dissenting Opinions: Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
- Reasoning and Analysis: Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.