Civil Procedure Keyed to Cound
Hart v. Wolff
The Plaintiff appealed from a dismissal of a complaint for failure to produce records for Defendants inspection. Plaintiff brought a defamation suit against Defendant concerning statements of alleged misappropriation of funds from Artic Bowl, Inc. (Arctic), a corporation that both Plaintiff and Defendant helped found which operated a bowling alley. From 1958-1959 Defendant served as the corporation’s vice-president until Metropolitan Mortgage and Securities, Inc. purchased control of Artic. Defendant then left the company. Plaintiff, who had served as Arctic’s president from 1958-59, remained with the new corporation and served as manager of the bowling alley.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.