SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Conflict of Laws Keyed to Brilmayer
Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.
Citation:
448 U.S. 261 (1980)Facts
Plaintiff, Thomas, was a District of Colombia resident hired by Defendant, Washington Gas Light Co. (“WGLC”), to perform work Washington, D.C., Virginia, and Maryland. In 1971, Thomas sustained a back injury while working in Virginia. Several weeks later, the Virginia Industrial Commission approved workmen’s compensation benefits for Thomas in the amount of $62 per week. In 1974, Thomas notified the Department of Labor of his intention to seek supplemental compensation under a Washington, D.C. Act. WGLC opposed the claim on the ground that since, as a matter of Virginia law, the Virginia award excluded any other recovery on account of the injury in Virginia, the D.C. obligation to give that award full faith and credit precluded a second, supplemental award in D.C. The administrative law judge agreed with WGLC that the Virginia award must be given res judicata effect in D.C. to the extent that it was res judicata in Virginia. However, he held that the Virginia award did not preclude a further award of compensation in Virginia, and Thomas was awarded permanent total disability benefits payable from the date of his injury with a credit for the amounts previously paid under the Virginia award. The Benefits Review Board upheld the award, but its order was reversed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which held that a second and separate proceeding in another jurisdiction upon the same injury is precluded by the Full Faith and Credit Clause. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Outline
Judgments from Other States and Foreign Nations