SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Conflict of Laws Keyed to Brilmayer
Duke v. Housen
Citation:
589 P.2d 334 (Wyo.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 863 (1979)Facts
On April 4, 1970, Plaintiff, Margaret Housen, was introduced to Defendant, “Pony” Duke. On the night of April 4th to 5th, Margaret engaged in sexual intercourse with Pony. Over the course of the following days, Pony professed his love for Margaret and confessed his desire to marry her. On April 8th, Margaret met Pony at the La-Guardia airport in New York and travelled by truck with him to Denver, Colorado. They engaged in sexual intercourse along the way. Upon reaching Denver, Pony lost interest in Margaret, lodged her in a local hotel, and left for his home in Meeteetse, Wyoming. Margaret contacted her brother, who then flew to Denver. Together, they traveled to Meeteetse and confronted Pony about his recent behavior. They agreed that Pony would accompany Margaret and her brother back to Washington, D.C. and apologize to her family. After arriving in Washington, D.C. and discussing the situation with her family, Margaret accompanied Pony to New York where they occupied a hotel room together and engaged in sexual intercourse. On the morning of April 21st, Pony broke up with Margaret and informed her, for the first time, that he had gonorrhea and that she probably had the venereal disease too.
During the trial, it was established that Pony became aware that he had gonorrhea at some time prior to March 22, 1970 after he received a positive test result from a doctor in Dallas, Texas. However, Pony flew to New York and visited his own doctor, who stated that, after an external exam, he could not find any “clinical evidence” of gonorrhea. As a result, Pony believed that he had been cured. After Pony told Margaret that she possibly had gonorrhea, Margaret visited her personal physician who confirmed, on April 22nd, that she did have gonorrhea. Beginning in January 1973, Margaret noticed a pain in her lower right side that eventually became so severe that it required medical attention. Margaret’s doctor testified that during major exploratory surgery, he found scar tissue adhesions had formed within a number of areas of Margaret’s lower abdomen. He stated that the pain would return and Margaret would live with it for the remainder of her life. Additionally, her doctor stated that her ability to bear children would be greatly reduced.
Margaret brought suit against Pony on April 19, 1974 in Wyoming state court, seeking hospital expenses, doctor’s expenses, lost wages, future medical expense, and damages for pain and suffering. Margaret also requested $1 million in exemplary damages, arguing that Pony was guilty of gross negligence when he infected her with gonorrhea. The jury found that Pony had been infected with gonorrhea at the time of his relations with Margaret, and awarded Margaret $300,000 in compensatory damages and $1 million in exemplary or punitive damages. Pony appealed. Pony argued that Margaret’s cause of action was barred by the passage of time and that her complaint should be dismissed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Outline
Choice of Law