SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Business Organizations Keyed to Allen
Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co.
Citation:
328 N.E.2d 505 (Mass. 1975).Facts
In the mid-1930s, Harry Rodd and Joseph Donahue worked at Royal Electrotype. By 1955, Rodd and Donahue were sole shareholders in Royal owning 80% and 20% respectively. In 1960, the company was renamed Rodd Electrotype and Harry’s sons soon became managers with Charles succeeding his father in 1965. In 1970, Harry wished to dispose of his remaining shares (he had already distributed a majority to his children) and Charles offered for the company to repurchase 45 shares for $800 per share. Between 1965 and 1969, the company had offered to purchase plaintiff’s shares for anywhere between $40 and $200 per share. When plaintiff learned of the purchase of Harry Rodd’s shares, she offered to sell her shares on the same terms, but her offer was rejected by defendant.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Outline
Corporations