SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Torts keyed to Robertson
Linegar v. Armour of America, Inc.
Citation:
United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit, 1990. 909 F.2d 1150.Facts
Missouri State Highway Patrol trooper, Jimmy Linegar, was conducting a routine traffic check and stopped a car with a Nevada license plate. The driver gave Linegar an Oregon driver’s license bearing the name Matthew Mark Samuels. However, from the patrol dispatcher, Linegar discovered that the name was an alias for a David Tate, who had an outstanding warrant for a weapons charge. Linegar was unsure that the description the dispatcher gave for David Tate matched the driver, so he decided to investigate further.
Allen Hines, another trooper on the scene with Linegar, approached the passenger side of the car while Linegar approached the driver’s side. After some questioning, Linegar asked the driver to step out of the vehicle. The driver, who was in fact David Tate, then brandished an automatic weapon and fired at the troopers. Tate first fired from inside the van and then from outside the van. By the time Tate finished shooting, Hines had been wounded by three shots and Linegar, whose body was shot by six bullets, laid dead. None of the five shots that hit the contour style protective vest he was wearing penetrated the vest or caused injury. The wounds Linegar suffered were caused by shots that struck parts of his body not protected by the vest.
The vest Linegar was wearing was issued to him by the Missouri State Highway Patrol when he joined the Patrol. The contour style was one of several different styles of vests then on the market and provided more protection to the sides of the body than the style that featured rectangular panels in front and back. However, it did not provide as much protection as a wrap around style vest. The front and back panels of the vest Linegar was wearing were held together by Velcro closures under the arms and did not meet at the sides of the body. This left an area along the sides and under the arms that were exposed when the vest was worn. This feature of the vest was obvious to the Patrol when they selected it. The area left exposed by the vest was area where Linegar suffered fatal wounds.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Refresher Course
Products Liability, Design, and Failure to Warn