SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Blum
Hodge v. Craig
Citation:
382 S.W.3d 325 (2012)Facts
Plaintiff and Defendant met at 16 years old, and Defendant was a mother of a one-year-old daughter. Defendant and Plaintiff dated on and off throughout high school and were sexually intimate. In early October 1991, Defendant broke up with Plaintiff and had sexual relations with Joey Hay. Defendant believed that she was pregnant with Hay’s child. Yet, after a negative pregnancy test, she returned to PLaintiff but never told him about Hay. Defendant admitted that she had sexual relations with both Hay and Plaintiff during the period when her son, Kyle, was conceived.
In November, Defendant told Plaintiff she thought she was pregnant, and she took a test. After a positive test, Plaintiff asked Defendant if she was sure that he was the father. Defendant said he was and that it could be no one else. As a result, Plaintiff proposed marriage to Defendant, and they were married in December 1991. Plaintiff raised Kyle believing he was his biological son, and in 1999, Plaintiff had a vasectomy. In late 2000, Defendant told Plaintiff she was having an affair, and Plaintiff and Defendant separated.
In November 2000, Defendant filed a complaint seeking divorce because of irreconcilable differences. The trial court finalized the divorce in February 2001, ordering Plaintiff to pay $250 per week in child support. During 2006 or 2007, Plaintiff began having doubts about whether he was Kyle’s biological father because he did not look like him. In February 2007, Plaintiff obtained a DNA sample from Kyle to have tested, and it was confirmed he was not his biological son. Plaintiff told Kyle and Defendant about a month later, and Defendant conceded that Plaintiff was not Kyle’s biological father.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Outline
Interpretation of the Contract