Confirm favorite deletion?
Criminal Law keyed to Dripps
United States v. Hankins
Facts
After receiving a tip from a confidential informant that Hankins (Defendant) was growing marijuana on his property, Detective Kevin Bibb of the South Central Kentucky Drug Task Force went to Defendant property and discovered marijuana growing in a wooded area. Bibb then obtained a warrant to search Defendant’s home and surrounding property. As a result of the search, a bag of marijuana and papers were found in his kitchen cabinet; plots of marijuana were found growing directly behind his home and garage; and plastic cups, Miracle-Gro, twine, weighing scales, a shotgun, revolver, ammunition, and Defendant’s truck were all seized. In total 212 marijuana plant were seized worth about $400,000. Defendant was arrested. Two days later, Defendant went to the Task Force office to retrieve money from his truck. Detective Bibb accompanied Defendant when he withdrew $2,000 in cash hidden behind the backseat. However, Jim Devasher, director of the Task Force refused to let Defendant keep the money. Defendant then contacted a longtime friend, James Chick. Unbeknownst to Defendant, Chick had been caught selling cocaine and rather than serve jail time, agreed to work as an informant for Special Agent David Hayes of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. Defendant told Chick that he wanted Devasher dead and would pay somebody to kill him. Chick contacted Hayes. Hayes instructed Chick to get Defendant to make the death threat again while Chick wore a transmitter. Thereafter, Defendant threatened to kill Devasher while speaking to Chick in Defendant’s home. Defendant moved to suppress the audio tapes of the threats. The district court denied Defendant’s motion. Defendant was convicted and he appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.