Conflicts Keyed to Currie
Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States
Facts
On April 28, 1936, the Government (Plaintiff) issued a check to Barner in the amount of $24.20 for services rendered to the Works Progress Administration. Unexplainably, Barner did not receive the check. Apparently the check was stolen and the endorsement forged, and the check was transferred to J.C. Penney Co. in exchange for cash and merchandise. J.C. Penney endorsed the check over to Clearfield Trust Co. (Defendant) and Clearfield (Defendant) endorsed the check over to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. Defendant guaranteed prior endorsements as required by Treasury regulations. Neither Defendant nor Penney were aware of or suspected a forgery. Barner informed his foreman on May 10, 1936, that he never received the check. Defendant and Penney learned of the forgery January 12, 1937. Defendant was first notified that the Government (Plaintiff) was seeking reimbursement on August 31, 1937. The Plaintiff’s cause of action was based upon the guarantee of the endorsement and was brought in federal district court in Pennsylvania. The court held that Pennsylvania law applied under the Erie Doctrine, and because the Plaintiff unreasonably delayed in giving notice of forgery, the action was barred. The court of appeals reversed, and Defendant appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.