Confirm favorite deletion?
Property Keyed to French
Phelps v. Bd. of Supervisors of Muscatine
Facts
Phelps (Plaintiff) owns land that lies in the flood plain of the Cedar River within Muscatine County, Iowa. In 1963, Muscatine County (Defendant) began construction of a bridge across the river near Plaintiff’s property. The river flooded in 1965, when the bridge was mostly complete, and again in 1969, after it was completed. Plaintiff’s land was naturally subject to flooding, but he claimed that the construction of the bridge had increased the degree of the flooding. He sued Defendant, arguing that the increase in flooding was a taking that entitled him to compensation for the damage to his property. The trial court ruled against him, holding that there was no taking because there was no way of knowing when the river would next flood and how much damage the future floods would cause. Plaintiff appealed.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.