Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Blum
Worcester Heritage Society, Inc. v. Trussell
Citation:31 Mass. App. 343, 577 N.E.2d 109 (1991)
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
- Topic: Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
- Parties: Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
- Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.: A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
- Brief Facts: A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
- Rule of Law: Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
- Facts: What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case. Review the Facts of this case here:
Plaintiff conveyed the house to defendant in 1984 for $20,100. At the time, the house was uninhabitable. Trussell bought it to restore it, agreeing to obey historic preservation restrictions. Per the agreement, he had to complete the restoration of the exterior in a year, but there was no time limit regarding the interior. Before buying, Trussell proved to the Society his ability to invest the purchase price plus $45,000, which was the estimated cost of restoration. After the transfer, Trussell lost his job, which slowed work on the house as he lacked the necessary funding. He hoped he would get additional funding from his father’s estate. Five years later, work on the exterior was still incomplete, with about 65-75% of it being done. No work had been done on the interior. The necessary remaining work was estimated to cost $100,000, which was higher than had been estimated at the time of the sale. Society sued for rescission.
- Issue(s): Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
- Holding: Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.