SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Fuller
Wood v. Boynton
Citation:
64 Wis. 265, 25 N.W. 42 (1885)Facts
In December 1883, the plaintiff, Ms. Wood, was in possession of a small stone whose nature and value she did not know. She had previously shown the stone to defendant Boynton, a jeweler, who offered to buy it for one dollar as a “specimen.” Initially, she declined, but later, needing money, she returned to Boynton’s store and sold him the stone for the previously offered price. Neither party knew the stone was a diamond at the time of the sale. The stone was later discovered to be a rough diamond worth approximately $700. Upon learning this, the plaintiff tendered $1.10 (the purchase price plus interest) to the defendants and demanded the return of the stone. When the defendants refused, she brought this action to recover possession of the diamond. The plaintiff testified that she had been told the stone might be a topaz, and Boynton testified that he had never seen an uncut diamond before and “it never entered his brain” that the stone might be a diamond.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.