Confirm favorite deletion?
Corporations Keyed to Rhee
Wilson v. Gandis
Citation:844 S.E.2d 631 (S.C. 2020)
Wilson and Gandis formed CCC, a manager-managed limited liability company, with each man owning a 50% membership interest. Wilson owned and operated Eastern Film Solutions (EFS). Gandis owned and operated DecoTex. Wilson and Gandis discussed expanding CCC’s scope of operations and winding down their individual businesses. In exchange for transferring EFS’s accounts to CCC, Wilson received $12,000 per month. Gandis engaged Shirley, a certified accountant, to provide CCC with accounting and formation advice. Wilson, a 45% member, brought an action against Gandis, Shirley, and CCC alleging they engaged in oppressive conduct against him.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.