Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Kuney
Whitten v. Greeley-Shaw
Citation:520 A.2d 1307 (1987).
Plaintiff and defendant engaged in an affair from 1972 to 1980. At some point the plaintiff gave defendant $64,000 to purchase a home in Maine near his vacation home. Later, defendant became frustrated with plaintiff’s broken promises and wanted “something in writing.” Defendant then drew up an “agreement” in which the plaintiff promised to make monthly payments to defendant, make any major repairs on her Maine home, take one trip a year with defendant, buy defendant one piece of jewelry per year, and visit or call defendant regularly. In return, the defendant promised not to make any calls to plaintiff’s homes or offices without his prior permission.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.