Confirm favorite deletion?
Constitutional Law Keyed to Barnett
Washington v. Glucksberg (Part 2)
Citation:521 U.S. 702 (1997)
Washington state passed two laws regarding suicide: a law that criminalized offering assistance to another person in a suicidal act, as well as the ‘Natural Death Act,’ which stated that “withholding . . . life sustaining treatment” at the direction of a patient “shall not . . . constitute a suicide,” and that state would not “condone, authorize, or approve mercy killing.” Doctors who treated terminally ill patients, and would have assisted those patients in ending their lives through physician assisted suicide, brought a constitutional challenge to the Washington State laws.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.
Parties:Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.
Procedural Posture & History:Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.
Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.
Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.
Rule of Law:Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.
Facts:What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.
Issue(s):Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.
Holding:Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.
Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.
Reasoning and Analysis:Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.