SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Contracts Keyed to Templin
Vanessa Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc.
Citation:
855 F.2d 888 (1st Cir. 1988)Facts
In March 1982, the Boston Symphony Orchestra engaged Vanessa Redgrave to narrate Stravinsky’s “Oedipus Rex” in concerts in Boston and New York. Following announcement of the engagement, the BSO received protests from subscribers and community members objecting to Redgrave’s political support for the Palestine Liberation Organization. On April 1, 1982, the BSO canceled its contract with Redgrave and the performances. BSO officials testified they canceled due to concerns about audience safety and potential disruptions that would detract from the artistic quality of the production, not to punish Redgrave for her views. Redgrave sued for breach of contract and for violation of her civil rights under the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, claiming the cancellation caused her to lose future professional opportunities, including theater and film roles.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.