SmartBrief
Confirm favorite deletion?
Commercial Law Keyed to Whaley
Valley Bank of Ronan v. Hughes
Citation:
334 Mont. 335, 147 P.3d 185 (2006)Facts
Hughes was the victim of a “Nigerian scam” where he was promised large sums of money for his aid in procuring agricultural equipment for import into Africa. On March 22, 2002, Hughes received four checks, two were personal checks and the other two were “official” checks. One official check was for $1 million and the other official check for $500,000. The personal checks were for significantly less. Prior to depositing the checks at Valley Bank, Hughes requested that the employees verify the validity of the checks. Hughes was assured by one of the bank’s employees that the “official” checks were “just like” cashier’s checks, and that the checks “would be good.” Hughes’s account was provisionally credited with the face amount of the checks. Hughes returned to the bank on March 26, 2002, to request Valley Bank initiate a wire transfer for $800,000 to an overseas bank. Around ten minutes after this transfer was initiated, the bank employees and Hughes learned that one of the personal checks was being returned for insufficient funds. Hughes immediately attempted to stop the wire transfer but the money had already been withdrawn at the overseas bank. Later, the bank discovered the two “official” checks were counterfeit and this resulted in Hughes’ account being overdrawn by $800,000. Hughes transferred $607,838 from his retirement account to cover the overdraft and executed a promissory note, secured by mortgaged property. with Valley Bank to cover the rest of the $800,000. After Hughes stopped paying on the note, Valley Bank initiated foreclosure on his property. Hughes counterclaimed against Valley Bank on the basis that the bank employees had falsely represented to him that at least the “official” checks he deposited would clear.
Only StudyBuddy Pro offers the complete Case Brief Anatomy*
Access the most important case brief elements for optimal case understanding.
*Case Brief Anatomy includes: Brief Prologue, Complete Case Brief, Brief Epilogue
- The Brief Prologue provides necessary case brief introductory information and includes:
Topic:
Identifies the topic of law and where this case fits within your course outline.Parties:
Identifies the cast of characters involved in the case.Procedural Posture & History:
Shares the case history with how lower courts have ruled on the matter.Case Key Terms, Acts, Doctrines, etc.:
A case specific Legal Term Dictionary.Case Doctrines, Acts, Statutes, Amendments and Treatises:
Identifies and Defines Legal Authority used in this case.
- The Case Brief is the complete case summarized and authored in the traditional Law School I.R.A.C. format. The Pro case brief includes:
Brief Facts:
A Synopsis of the Facts of the case.Rule of Law:
Identifies the Legal Principle the Court used in deciding the case.Facts:
What are the factual circumstances that gave rise to the civil or criminal case? What is the relationship of the Parties that are involved in the case.Issue(s):
Lists the Questions of Law that are raised by the Facts of the case.Holding:
Shares the Court's answer to the legal questions raised in the issue.Concurring / Dissenting Opinions:
Includes valuable concurring or dissenting opinions and their key points.Reasoning and Analysis:
Identifies the chain of argument(s) which led the judges to rule as they did.
- The Brief Prologue closes the case brief with important forward-looking discussion and includes:
Policy:
Identifies the Policy if any that has been established by the case.Court Direction:
Shares where the Court went from here for this case.
Topic Resources
Topic Charts & Notes